ABSTRACT
resumen está disponible en el texto completo
Abstract Introduction: Acute kidney injury is a frequent complication in patients with COVID-19 and its occurrence is a potential indicator of multi-organ dysfunction and disease severity. Objective: Develop, through an expert consensus, evidence-based recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute kidney injury in patients with SARS CoV2 / COVID-19 infection. Materials and methods: Based on a rapid systematic review in Embase and Pubmed databases and documents from scientific societies, we made preliminary recommendations and consulted with an expert group through an online tool. Then we defined agreement after at least 70 % consensus approval. Quality evidence was evaluated according to the type of document included. The strength of the recommendations was graded as strong or weak. Results: Fifty clinical experts declared their conflict of interest; the consultation took place between May 2 and 29, 2020. The range of agreement ranged from 75.5 % to 100 %. Recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in patients with SARS CoV2 infection are presented. Conclusions: Although the good quality information available regarding acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 is scarce, the recommendations of clinical experts will guide clinical decision-making and strategies around patients with this complication, guaranteeing care focused on the people, with high quality standards, and the generation of safety, health and wellness policies for multidisciplinary care teams.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19 , Patients , Colombia , Diagnosis , Acute Kidney InjuryABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: Las personas con diálisis de mantenimiento se consideran una población en alto riesgo de infección por SARS-CoV-2, complicaciones y muerte. La periodicidad de la diálisis, la organización y la demanda en las unidades de diálisis y las limitaciones de alfabetización en salud poblacional limitan el cumplimiento del aislamiento y el distanciamiento social. Objetivo: Desarrollar, mediante un consenso de expertos, recomendaciones informadas en evidencia para la prevención, el diagnóstico y el manejo de la infección por SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión rápida de literatura en Pubmed, Embase y sociedades científicas. La calidad de evidencia fue evaluada según el tipo de estudio incluido. El acuerdo se definió para cada recomendación con umbral de al menos 70% de aprobación. La fuerza de las recomendaciones fue graduada como fuerte o débil. Resultados: El colectivo fue consultado entre el 17 y 19 de mayo de 2020. Se obtuvo respuesta de 44 expertos clínicos que declararon conflicto de interés previo a la consulta. El acuerdo de las recomendaciones estuvo entre 70,5 y 100%. Se presentan las recomendaciones de un colectivo experto para la prevención, el diagnóstico y el manejo de infección por SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Conclusión: Debido a la reciente aparición de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y las incertidumbres respecto a la prevención, el diagnóstico y el manejo, las recomendaciones presentadas se conciben como un estándar colombiano que permita garantizar un cuidado centrado en las personas con enfermedad renal crónica y la protección de los profesionales de la salud.
Abstract Introduction: People with chronic dialysis are considered a population at high risk of SARS CoV2 infection and its derived complications and death. The need to go to strict dialysis schedules, the high demand in the kidney facilities and the difficulties derived from the time and space organization in the rooms in the face to the pandemic added to the difficult learning, teaching and adapting new protocols manifest the needed of standard recommendation according to this problem in people who couldn't have an ideal isolation. Objective: Develop through an expert consensus, evidence-informed recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic kidney disease on Dialysis. Materials and methods: We carried out a quick literature review, PubMed, Embase and scientific societies were consulted. The quality of the evidence was considered according to the type of study included. The agreement threshold defined for each recommendation was > 70% approval among experts. The strength of the recommendations was rated as strong or weak. Results: Between May 17 and 19, 2020, was conformed a team of 44 clinical experts who declared their interest conflict prior to the consultation. The agreement of the recommendations was between 70.5% and 100%. The recommendations were separated in prevention, early identification, and diagnostic, isolation in hemodialysis facilities and peritoneal dialysis, and team protection. Ethical considerations also were included. Conclusion: Due to the recent appearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the uncertainties regarding prevention, diagnosis and management, the recommendations presented are conceived as a Colombian standard that allows guaranteeing focused care for people with chronic kidney disease and the protection of health team.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , COVID-19 , Patients , Renal Dialysis , Colombia , DiagnosisABSTRACT
El síndrome PFAPA es la entidad más frecuente dentro de los síndromes de fiebres periódicas que pueden manifestarse desde la infancia. Es un síndrome autoinflamatorio caracterizado por una disfunción en las citoquinas, de carácter autolimitado y de etiología desconocida, aunque se han reportado casos de presentación familiar; lo que sugiere la existencia de una base genética de la enfermedad. Se presenta con episodios febriles que suelen acompañarse de aftas orales, adenopatías cervicales, faringoamigdalitis y síntomas constitucionales. En los exámenes de laboratorio es frecuente encontrar elevación marcada de la proteína C reactiva, leucocitosis y aumento de IgG, IgA e IgM. El diagnóstico se realiza utilizando los criterios modificados de Thomas, que incluyen parámetros clínicos, antecedentes y diagnósticos de exclusión. Se presenta el caso de un paciente de 4 años de edad que consultó a un hospital por un cuadro febril, movimientos tónico-clónicos generalizados, desviación de la mirada, sialorrea y relajación de esfínteres. También presentó cefalea de localización frontal y odinofagia. En la cavidad oral se observaron lesiones tipo aftas, y se evidenciaron adenopatías cervicales. El paciente no respondió al manejo con antibióticos, y se observó que cumplía con los criterios de diagnóstico para síndrome PFAPA, luego de descartarse un proceso infeccioso. Se inició terapia con corticoides con respuesta favorable y se concluyó que el paciente tenía un cuadro compatible con síndrome PFAPA.
PFAPA syndrome is the most frequent illness within the syndromes of periodic fevers manifesting during childhood. It is an auto-inflammatory syndrome characterized by cytokine dysfunction, a self-limiting nature, and unknown etiology; family cases have been reported, suggesting the existence of a genetic basis for the disease. PFAPA syndrome is manifested with febrile episodes that are usually accompanied by oral aphthae, cervical adenopathy, pharyngotonsillitis and constitutional symptoms. In laboratory tests, it is common to find marked elevation of C reactive protein, leukocytosis and increased IgG, IgA and IgM levels. Diagnosis is reached by means of the modified Thomas criteria that include clinical parameters, personal and family history, and exclusion diagnoses. The case of a 4-year-old patient who visited the hospital with fever, generalized tonic-clonic seizures and sphincter relaxation is presented. The patient reported frontal headache and odynophagia. Aphthous stomatitis was observed, and cervical adenopathies were evident. The patient did not respond to antibiotic therapy, and met the diagnostic criteria for PFAPA syndrome after an infectious process was ruled out. Corticosteroid therapy was initiated with a favorable response. It was concluded that the patient had a diagnosis compatible with PFAPA syndrome